|
Wireless Site Survey
Call eTribeca at
888-219-0207 or e-mail us at
sales@etribeca.com to discuss and schedule wireless
site surveys. We perform surveys both for
end-users and as sub-contractors to other organizations.
We cover Domestic US.
The Importance of a Site
Survey
For radio LAN’s it is very
important to perform a site-survey to determine the
effects of the facility on the propagated of radio
waves. This makes it possible to calculate the
number of wireless Access Points needed, as multiple
cells will be necessary in a large building. It is
also important to test that there is no interference
that may present at some locations that may make the
wireless network inoperable.
Part of the wireless network design is to identify the
location of these Access Points to provide an interface
to network resources located on the wired network and
adequate coverage for roaming users throughout the
facility.
If a wireless network were
deployed in a completely open area, free from walls,
building components and furniture, radio waves from the
wireless devices would be able to maintain an omni
directional radiation pattern, making it simpler to
predict the maximum operating range among all devices
and the location of the Access Points. The
construction of the facility offers radio waves through
flooring, for example, depends on the building methods
present between the floors. Range is greatest if
passing through plywood, fair if passing through
concrete, and very poor if going through metal.
eTribeca’s engineers will conduct
a detailed site survey of the building in preparation
for deployment of the wireless Ethernet equipment.
The only true method for optimum site performance is to
test empirically for proper placement of Access Points
and type of antenna to be employed. There is no
way to determine the distance that a signal will travel
without a survey. Metal film on glass, leaded
glass, steel studded walls, cement floors and walls with
steel reinforcement, foil backed insulated walls,
firewalls stairwells and elevator shafts are typical
items that will reduce range. In a multi floor
building, it is necessary to do a three dimensional
profile.
We shall require a layout plan of
the building for marking up. If there is none
available, eTribeca LLC will create one.
Site Survey Methodology
A. Overview of a Wireless Site
Survey
To simulate the operation of the
wireless network as closely to future operating
conditions as possible, we will use two Cisco Aironet
802.11b Access Points mounted at different locations,
and two laptop computer systems equipped with Cisco
Aironet 802.11b series wireless LAN cards, which can be
used to roam throughout the facility. Theses tests will
be performed 1) to demonstrate the technology and 2) to
determine the area covered and quality of Wireless
Connectivity. Both the wireless cards and the 802.11b
Access Points run at 11Mbps. Our engineers have
experience with using
AirMagnet for site surveys as well as Cisco.
The basic antenna that will be
used is a 2.2dBi Dipole. If the topology of the building
demands it, we shall also survey with 3 dBi Omni or
8.5dBi patch antennae, or such other antennae as our
engineers consider to be appropriate when they are on
site.
The test applications that will be used are “PING” and
Cisco Aironet “Site Survey Utility” software. By varying the PING
arguments (the number of times to PING), we are able to
monitor the connectivity of the wireless link.
PING Test: Each laptop
continuously PINGs two Access Points. The tester records
statistics on the minimum round-trip time, maximum
round-trip time, average round-trip time and percentage
of no-response (packet losses).
Redundancy Test: Redundancy between Access Points is
tested utilizing “Site Survey Utility”, a testing application from
Cisco Aironet. This test shows the signal strength and
quality from the Wireless LAN Adapter to each Access
Point.
Load test: In this test, creating a peer-to-peer
environment simulates a LAN environment between two
computers, and file transfers are performed between the
two. This demonstrates the relationship between
bandwidth and distance in the wireless infrastructure.
B. Explanation of PING test
PING is a utility used to perform
a connectivity test in a TCP/IP network. PING works at
the network layer. The protocol utilized is ICMP
(Internet Control Message Protocol), which is in the
same layer as IP (Internet Protocol). The program
transmits a predetermined Ethernet packet size to a
destination host, which is returned to the originating
computer. PING reports the round-trip time of the
packet. By default, PING sends out four requests and
reports the statistics in the form of a maximum,
minimum, and average round-trip time. If there is no
response within certain
A typical PING test reply looks like the following:
Pinging 209.14.129.1 with 500 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.14.129.1: bytes=500 time=12ms TTL=128
Reply from 209.14.129.1: bytes=500 time=12ms TTL=128
Reply from 209.14.129.1: bytes=500 time=14ms TTL=128
. . . (omitted 94 lines, total 100 lines) . . .
Reply from 209.14.129.1: bytes=500 time=16ms TTL=128
Reply from 209.14.129.1: bytes=500 time=13ms TTL=128
Reply from 209.14.129.1: bytes=500 time=16ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 209.14.129.1:
Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 62ms, Average = 15ms
C.
Explanation of Cisco Aironet Site Survey Utility
This
Utility shows the status of the access point to which
the client adapter is associated.
Access Point
The access point to which the client adapter is
associated. This field may show the access point's name,
IP address, and MAC address.
Channel
The channel number and radio frequency that the access
point is currently using for communications.
Signal Strength
The current signal strength of the most recently
received packets. Differences in signal strength are
indicated by the following colors: green (strongest),
yellow (middle of the range), and red (weakest).
Noise Level
The level of background radio frequency energy.
Differences in background noise are indicated by the
following colors: green (low noise), yellow (middle of
the range), and red (high noise).
Signal Quality
The current signal quality of the most recently received
packets. Differences in signal quality are indicated by
the following colors: green (highest quality), yellow
(average), and red (lowest quality).
Beacons Received
The percentage of beacon packets received from the
access point versus those expected to be received.
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
The difference between the signal strength and the noise
level.
Overall Link Quality
A combination of signal strength and signal quality.
Differences in quality are indicated by the following
colors: green (highest quality), yellow (average), and
red (lowest quality).
Possible Values: Poor, Fair, Good, or Excellent; 0 to
100%
Link Speed
The site survey utility monitors transmitted network
traffic, and the link speed reflects the current
transmit rate of data packets. Differences in link speed
are indicated by the following colors: green (fastest),
yellow (middle of the range), and red (slowest).
Possible Values: 1, 2, 5.5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 18, 24, 36,
48, or 54 Mbps, depending on radio band
Call eTribeca at
888-219-0207 or e-mail us at
sales@etribeca.com to discuss and schedule wireless
site surveys. We perform surveys both for
end-users and as sub-contractors to other organizations.
We cover Domestic US.
|